If you admit that hell exists - which you do by your nickname - you admit as well that hell itself is a punishment, otherwise it wouldn't be the concept of hell
1. The dungeon is hell, but people keep coming back for more. 2. We all know all the hot chicks are evil, so you guys stay in heaven and i'll go to hell. On Topic I have no problems with your name nasher, i make fun of all religions anyways. But yea ofcourse there will be people who will take offence. Then again, i believe in freedom of speech too. So we're in a conundrum here. Maybe rename to "All believers will go to hell". But then all the x-files knobs will start crying. And i have only so many "smallest violins in the world" I can play. Ahh fuck it. Aint no resolving this one. Stick with nasher, its gh3y enough. :O
U got me :? bah Ps. Btw then "Hell" would be a damn full place Since if you read the Bible (I've read just enough myself, not the full book though) you will fast see that the teachings cause every single person walking on earth be a sinner and that means every1 would eventually go to Hell.
Maybe you should put up a site called: ReligionBashing.org or something like that. That way you can even make some money of it. And you can get it out of your system as well.
Does using a nick like "Santa Claus" or "Toothfairy "make them real? By ur logic it does. Then every thing that I ever question would be real if I just used their names in any meaning.
You fail to see the reasoning. "Only Christians go to hell" is an assertive speech act (compare: Searle), therefore you admit by saying it that it is true. The other option would be admitting that the whole phrase is untrue. But that wouldn't be funny. A mere name doesn't state anything, a phrase does. But yes, everything is true unless proven otherwise. As long as someone says it exists and you can't prove him wrong - it exists.
just keep those names alive keep freedom of speech, i mean should we ban everyone who says ghey or fag cos it can offend other people.. the homosexual once.. NO so why the big fuss about this.... keep the freedom, make fun, people should just chill, why get all worked up about it 1. its a game 2. ignore it 3. if you are a good christian you dont play cs's, cos ur killing people 4. lets make a gangbang party with God and Allah and all the believers and make them buttpound each other. oww wait im i gonne get killed now?? banned NOOOEEZZZ GAWD SAVE MI NAO !! fail aka I saw God buttpounding Allah
If we got freedom of speech, we have to keep the Hitlers, the Stalins and a lot more we used to kick and ban.
Complete freedom of speech is never possible since then you could just say anything about everything anytime you want and that would cause some problems. But Hitler, Stalin etc. are in different league with things like "Jihad" or "I saw God buttpound Allah" since Hitler and Stalin are propably the two most f*cked up dudes in the history and they lived and existed unlike God and made horrible things.
I say god exists. *Prove* me wrong. And how is Jihad or the Crusades less bad than Stalin or Hitler? It's the same ulterior motive.
personally i couldnt give a crap about people joining with only christians go to hell...cos if you see what nasher means here ONLY christians believe in the Hell and Heaven thingy... so only christians can go to there Hell... would be strange to walk in Hell and see a moslim walking there aswell.. might wanne scratch ur head and ask urself if you did believe in Gawd and not accidently in Allah XD joking with religion is okay, but really being rasist isnt.. and yes you can see the difference Only christians go to hell or all Christians should be killed or All Yews need to be gassed 1ste is harmlees, 2nd is more rude and more offending, 3th is =BAN
well true i would ban it aswell, only difference is.. 3th is way more offending imo..still i agree 2nd is also ban i hope you see the difference i tried to explain tho
I say God doesn't exist. Prove me wrong. (I said "lived and existed", don't even try to say God lives/lived ) Did Jihad cause the bloodiest war ever?= no Did Jihad cause the holocaust? = no Did Jihad kill millions and millions of people without a solid reason? = no Jihad (other similar things also) are of course "bad" but no where near Hitler or Stalin. There is no way that anyone can ever do such things as Hitler did and that makes him the worst person ever. Saying that some people are the worst dudes in history doesn't mean some other ppl are good but in comparison to Hitler etc. Jihad or the Crusades don't even get close.
Nice try but you still rely your opinion on god on faith. You believe that there is no god. I believe there is. Neither you nor I have any sort of evidence so as long as *you* don't find anything to prove otherwise - he exists. You always have to prove the "positive" opinion wrong. Sorry Nash but that's a way too simple approach. If people back then would've had the same access to weapons it would've been as bloody or even bloodier than what Hitler did. Hitler was one bad motherfucker but there are a lot of others who come very, very, very close and Stalin even surpasses him in my opinion. You can't weigh up the number of victims but the way it happened was even more cruel with Stalin.
Aren't you also leaning on your faith that God does exist? Neither you nor I have any sort of evidence so as long as you don't find anything to prove otherwise - he doesn't exist. You also have to prove my point wrong. True that it's the way it's done and not the amount of the dead but...more cruel than the holocaust? I really don't think that there has been anything as cruel as organizely shooting, piling up, and burning people belonging to one group.
I'm relying solely on faith. The argument that god doesn't exist however doesn't want to be based on faith. And there is the difference. Stalin did that as well. The Crusades? Slicing up muslims, raping their women in front of their dying eyes and letting them bleed to death isn't cruel enough?
So my deep belief that God doesn't exist isn't counted as faith? Explain please. Didn't you just on your last post use Stalin's doings as more cruel than Hitler's? Why the sudden change? I have always kept the crusades, after Holocaust , the most cruel thing but still I don't think it tops Holocaust. The camps also had similar stuff going on there such as raping (propably in front of children, known family members), other ways of humiliation and intense torture. Btw the crusades back up "Only Christians Will Go to Hell" pretty well.
this is going nowhere... stalin, hitler and all genocides are wrong cant say one is more evil then the other.. cos its all one faked up thing. now if there is a god or not is upto the person, lets not discuss that anymore, cos you will never get a agreement on this... NEVER.. some believe and some dont.. THERE !! closed thing here was could you use the name yes or no.. well i explained it clearly and i also made a example in which case it would be wrong and stuff i will give a other example about this sjit, but thats for tomorrow